I've spent much of my career around software project management and procurement. My co-founder, Laura, comes from the construction sector. At first glance, you would expect the day-to-day problems in those two worlds to be completely different.
But when we started comparing notes, we noticed something interesting.
A margin leak in software can look surprisingly similar to a margin leak in construction. The materials are different. The suppliers are different. The project environment is different. But the root cause is often the same: procurement is not tracked clearly enough, and the offers are too hard to compare.
Here are two experiences that made that very clear to me.
The forgotten follow-up
One of my biggest "aha" moments in procurement did not come from a complex negotiation strategy. It came from something much simpler: forgetting.
It usually happens like this.
A project moves forward, you choose a vendor or supplier, and later another company reaches out and asks:
"Why did you go with them? We could have offered a better price."
And sometimes the honest answer is uncomfortable:
Because I forgot to follow up, and you forgot to send the response.
Not because their offer was worse. Not because the scope was wrong. Not because the decision was strategic. Simply because the offer never properly made it into the decision process.
When you are responsible for a large number of moving parts, this is easy to understand. The supplier gets busy. You get busy. The follow-up disappears into email, chat, or someone's mental to-do list.
The result is simple: you may end up paying more, not because you made a bad procurement decision, but because you never had the full picture in front of you.
That is a margin leak.
The apples-to-oranges problem
The second issue is comparability.
Even when all the responses arrive on time, the offers are often difficult to compare. One supplier gives you a lump sum. Another gives you a detailed breakdown. A third includes something that the others left out. Everyone uses a different format.
At that point, you are no longer comparing offers properly. You are interpreting documents.
Stage
Unstructured
After
Click a row to highlight
That makes it much harder to make a confident decision. You can still choose the cheapest offer, but you may not know whether it includes the same scope, quantities, assumptions, exclusions, or delivery terms.
Forcing offers into a shared structure is one of the simplest ways to improve procurement quality. Not because every supplier needs to think the same way, but because you need a clear way to compare what they are actually offering.
Two things that improve margins
For me, better procurement comes down to two practical things: tracking and visualisation.
It does not matter whether you are buying software infrastructure, subcontractor work, materials, equipment, or services. The same principles apply.
Tracking means knowing who you asked, who has replied, who still needs to respond, and whose court the ball is in. It prevents good offers from being missed simply because someone forgot to follow up.
Visualisation means seeing the offers clearly enough to compare them. In ReflectHub, for example, we approach this by placing offers side by side and using structured columns for quantities, prices, and key details. When the numbers are in the same format, the trade-offs become much easier to understand.
This does not mean procurement should become only about price. Quality, reliability, delivery time, scope, and risk still matter. But you can only evaluate those properly when the information is complete and comparable.
Improving margins is not always about aggressively squeezing vendors or suppliers for the lowest possible price.
A lot of the time, it is about something more basic: making sure you do not miss quotes, lose follow-ups, or compare offers based on incomplete information.
Margins are not only lost on site or during delivery. They are often lost much earlier, in the messy middle between asking for prices, chasing responses, and making decisions without a clear overview.
Fix that process, and better margins become much more achievable.
ReflectHub keeps procurement tracked and offers comparable — one place to see who still owes a response and to line up quotes side by side. Book a demo for a walkthrough.
